>twitter doesn't care after a week and now you are left with a character with no fanbase and she has been put in such a small box that it is nearly impossible to make a good comic with her because of the baggage >like with all characters you don't know what to do with you make her some made up sexuality in hopes that twitter users will pick up the slack of the previous fanbase you lost >all of your poor decisions have chipped away at her fanbase to a point where barely any of them are left >proceed to do nothing with her besides a few small cameos here and there for the next 4 years >not knowing what to do with her you retcon her into a mutant so she can be integrated into other x-books >next you give her a mini-series full of whacky zoomer memes, but don't worry it was written obnoxiously on purpose by a hack writer trying to be clever >her ongoing ends and you follow it up by forcing her into a poorly written team book where her powers are nerfed and she is written completely out of character 137037161 >character had a small but dedicated fanbase, not big enough to carry a comic, but big enough to make merch profitable But the same visual design on a character who wasn't asexual would be found to be more attractive.Īnonymous 05/03/23(Wed)21:58:12 No. You can make a visually appealing asexual who might present a sexually attractive image.

And they don't even get the fetishization that gays get. There is no demographic with a natural attraction towards asexuals. And most women score gay men as less attractive.īut asexuals doesn't even get that. And then there is the subset of men who fetishize lesbians and woman on woman scenarios.īut most men actually score lesbians as less attractive.

But with lesbians you have the added benefit of them appealing to lesbians. You can even see this in regards to gays like lesbians and whatnot. Generally speaking, people who aren't even potential mates, come across as much less attractive. But you're missing the fact that asexuals simply aren't close to as sexually appealing on the mere premise alone that they're asexual. >You can have sexually appearing asexuals.

Princeless jeremy whitley